"In your field of study, what is the impact on research of creationnism dogmas that seems to be creeping up everywhere?"
-
Jack Hills Zircons: New Information About Earth's Earliest Crust
August 27, 2008 / Posted by: Daniella Scalice
Members of NAI’s University of Wisconsin, Madison team have a new paper in Earth and Planetary Science Letters presenting their analyses of 4.35 – 3.36 billion year old detrital zircons from the Jack Hills, Western Australia. Their data reveal relatively high lithium abundances compared to other zircons, as well as lithium isotope ratios that are similar to continental crust weathering products rather than ocean floor basalts. The results support the hypothesis that continental-type crust and oceans existed by 4.3 billion years ago, and suggest that weathering was extensive in the early Archean.
- Professor at University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo makes impact on the Study of Planetary Habitability
- Daniel Glavin Wins 2010 Nier Prize
- Vatican Hosts Study Week on Astrobiology
- Taking a Bite of Antarctic Ice
- Dr. Linda Billings Recieves Lifetime Achievement Award
- Discoveries in the Deep
- Ethics of Space Exploration
- Eigenbrode Earns Chief Technologist’s Top Prize
- Success in Monterey Bay Canyon
- Can Darwin Help Us Find Life Elsewhere?
Wandering Geologist said:
I read this paper and it made no sense to me. When I asked my geochemist friends to explain what structural/chemical role lithium has in zircon, they said: “What? It doesn’t have any. It’s a contaminant.” After I pointed this paper out to them, ALL said that the study was deeply flawed.
So, what does this mean for this work? My impression is that it their lithium values don’t tell us anything about the early earth. Hey, what happened to the peer-review process on this one!??
curious said:
if lithium can move in and out of this mineral then what does it tell us about anything